76ers vs memphis grizzlies match player stats
The 76ers vs memphis grizzlies match player stats from March 11, 2026, tell the story of an exciting NBA regular-season game in which the Philadelphia 76ers defeated the Memphis Grizzlies 139-129 at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Philadelphia secured the victory with a dominant 41-point fourth quarter, strong individual performances, and a significant advantage in turnovers forced. Cameron Payne led the 76ers with 32 points and 10 assists, while Kelly Oubre Jr. contributed 30 points and 12 rebounds. For Memphis, Ty Jerome scored 26 points and delivered eight assists, while Cedric Coward controlled the glass with 16 rebounds.
The final score only reveals part of the story. Memphis scored efficiently from the field and made 17 three-pointers, yet Philadelphia found ways to turn defensive pressure into scoring opportunities. The 76ers committed only 10 turnovers compared with Memphis’s 20, recorded 13 steals, and converted 38 of their 46 free-throw attempts. Those differences proved crucial in a game where both teams produced more than 125 points.
This detailed breakdown examines the final score, quarter-by-quarter performance, individual player statistics, team comparisons, offensive efficiency, defensive contributions, and the most important lessons from the matchup. Whether you want to check a player’s points, compare the teams’ performances, or understand why Philadelphia won, the following analysis provides a clear picture of the game using the supplied statistical record.
76ers vs memphis grizzlies match player stats: Game Overview
The March 11 contest was a high-scoring meeting between two teams that demonstrated different strengths. Memphis generated substantial offense through its shooting and rebounding, while Philadelphia combined efficient overall shooting with better ball security and more defensive takeaways.
Final Score and Game Information
| Game Detail | Information |
| Matchup | Philadelphia 76ers vs. Memphis Grizzlies |
| Date | March 11, 2026 |
| Competition | NBA regular season |
| Venue | Xfinity Mobile Arena |
| Location | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
| Final Score | Philadelphia 139, Memphis 129 |
| Winning Team | Philadelphia 76ers |
| Losing Team | Memphis Grizzlies |
| Attendance | 17,897 |
| Philadelphia Record, as supplied | 35-30 |
| Memphis Record, as supplied | 23-41 |
| Philadelphia Home Record, as supplied | 18-16 |
| Memphis Away Record, as supplied | 11-22 |
| Season Series | Philadelphia led 2-0, according to the supplied record |
Philadelphia won by 10 points, but the margin does not fully reflect how competitive the game remained offensively. Memphis scored 104 points through the first three quarters, while Philadelphia entered the fourth quarter with 98. The 76ers then produced 41 points in the final period and held Memphis to 25.
That 16-point difference in fourth-quarter scoring was the decisive statistical development.
Philadelphia’s victory also completed a season-series sweep according to the supplied information. The teams had previously met on December 31, 2025, when Philadelphia won 139-136 in overtime. The March rematch ended with the same winning team but a different scoring pattern.
Why This Game Deserves a Closer Look
Several details make this matchup particularly interesting:
- Cameron Payne’s all-around performance: He led Philadelphia in scoring and assists, recording 32 points and 10 assists.
- Kelly Oubre Jr.’s two-way contribution: He scored 30 points, collected 12 rebounds, and recorded two steals.
- Ty Jerome’s offensive production: He scored 26 points and supplied eight assists for Memphis.
- Cedric Coward’s rebounding: His 16 rebounds led every player listed in the supplied statistics.
- Philadelphia’s defensive pressure: The 76ers recorded 13 steals and forced Memphis into 20 turnovers.
- The fourth-quarter surge: Philadelphia scored 41 points in the final period to secure the win.
These performances show why individual box scores are most useful when considered alongside team statistics. A high-scoring player can deliver an excellent offensive performance without necessarily playing for the winning team. Likewise, a team can overcome a rebounding disadvantage by taking better care of the ball and creating more scoring opportunities.
Quarter-by-Quarter Score Breakdown
The scoring progression explains how Philadelphia overcame Memphis’s strong offensive start and established control in the final quarter.
| Quarter | Philadelphia 76ers | Memphis Grizzlies | Quarter Result |
| First Quarter | 32 | 32 | Tie |
| Second Quarter | 36 | 39 | Memphis +3 |
| Third Quarter | 30 | 33 | Memphis +3 |
| Fourth Quarter | 41 | 25 | Philadelphia +16 |
| Final Score | 139 | 129 | Philadelphia +10 |
First Quarter: Both Teams Start at the Same Pace
Philadelphia and Memphis scored 32 points apiece in the opening quarter. Neither team established an early scoring advantage, setting the stage for an evenly matched contest.
The equal score also meant that the opening period offered little indication of the eventual winner. In a game with such high offensive output, the first quarter served primarily as a foundation for the scoring battle that followed.
Second Quarter: Memphis Builds a Small Lead
Memphis scored 39 points in the second quarter, three more than Philadelphia’s 36. That performance gave the Grizzlies a narrow advantage as the game progressed.
The quarter was notable because Memphis maintained its offensive production while Philadelphia continued scoring at a high level. The three-point difference was meaningful, but not large enough to create a comfortable lead.
Third Quarter: Memphis Maintains Its Advantage
Memphis again outscored Philadelphia, this time 33-30. The Grizzlies entered the final quarter with 104 points, compared with Philadelphia’s 98.
At that stage, Memphis had scored six more points across the second and third quarters combined. Philadelphia needed a substantial response to turn the game around.
The 76ers answered with their best scoring period of the night.
Fourth Quarter: Philadelphia Takes Control
Philadelphia’s 41-point fourth quarter changed the outcome. Memphis managed 25 points, leaving the 76ers with a 16-point advantage for the period.
The fourth-quarter difference was larger than the final winning margin. Philadelphia’s 16-point advantage in that period overcame the six-point deficit it had carried into the quarter, producing the final 10-point victory.
The statistical record supports a clear conclusion: Philadelphia’s late scoring surge was the defining feature of the game. Memphis had been competitive for three quarters, but the 76ers delivered the stronger finish.
Complete Philadelphia 76ers Player Stats
Philadelphia’s offensive production was led by Cameron Payne and Kelly Oubre Jr., with Quentin Grimes and VJ Edgecombe also making substantial contributions. The supplied player statistics show that Philadelphia had several scoring options rather than relying on a single player to carry the offense.
Philadelphia 76ers Box Score
| Player | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Steals | Blocks |
| Cameron Payne | 30 | 32 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 2 |
| Kelly Oubre Jr. | 38 | 30 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Quentin Grimes | 35 | 23 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| VJ Edgecombe | 35 | 21 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 |
| Dominick Barlow | 34 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Trendon Watford | 15 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Dalen Terry | 22 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Adem Bona | 16 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Jabari Walker | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Justin Edwards | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Team leaders according to the supplied statistics:
- Points: Cameron Payne, 32
- Rebounds: Kelly Oubre Jr., 12
- Assists: Cameron Payne, 10
- Steals: Cameron Payne and VJ Edgecombe, 3 each
- Blocks: Cameron Payne and Trendon Watford, 2 each
The supplied starting lineup consisted of Dominick Barlow, Adem Bona, Kelly Oubre Jr., Quentin Grimes, and VJ Edgecombe. Cameron Payne was listed among the bench players.
MarJon Beauchamp, Andre Drummond, Kyle Lowry, and Tyrese Martin were listed as did not play because of the coach’s decision.
Cameron Payne: 32 Points and 10 Assists
Cameron Payne delivered Philadelphia’s most productive individual performance in the supplied box score. He finished with 32 points, three rebounds, 10 assists, three steals, and two blocks in 30 minutes.
His combination of scoring and playmaking stands out. Payne was not simply a high-volume scorer. His 10 assists indicate that he also played a major role in creating opportunities for teammates.
A double-double is recorded when a player reaches double digits in two of the five traditional statistical categories: points, rebounds, assists, steals, or blocks. Payne’s 32 points and 10 assists therefore gave him a points-and-assists double-double.
His defensive numbers add another dimension to the performance. Three steals suggest meaningful activity in passing lanes and ball pressure, while two blocks provide additional evidence of defensive involvement. The box score does not reveal the exact circumstances of those plays, so it would be inaccurate to assign a specific defensive strategy to each one.
Payne’s performance is particularly important when evaluating the final quarter. Philadelphia scored 41 points in that period, but the supplied data does not include quarter-specific player scoring. His final totals establish his overall impact without proving how many of those points came in the fourth quarter.
Kelly Oubre Jr.: 30 Points and 12 Rebounds
Kelly Oubre Jr. finished with 30 points and 12 rebounds in 38 minutes. He also recorded one assist, two steals, and one block.
His scoring total placed him second among Philadelphia’s listed players, while his 12 rebounds led the team. That combination made him one of the most influential players on both ends of the court.
Oubre’s rebounding was especially valuable because Memphis collected 44 rebounds as a team, compared with Philadelphia’s 40. Although the 76ers lost the overall rebounding comparison, Oubre’s individual contribution helped limit the disadvantage.
His two steals also contributed to Philadelphia’s defensive activity. The team’s 13 steals were substantially higher than Memphis’s five, and Oubre was responsible for two of Philadelphia’s takeaways.
One important distinction is that individual rebounds and team rebounding totals measure different things. A player may collect a large share of his team’s rebounds even when the opponent wins the overall battle. Oubre’s 12 rebounds demonstrate his individual production, not a Philadelphia advantage in total rebounding.
Quentin Grimes: 23 Points in 35 Minutes
Quentin Grimes recorded 23 points, three rebounds, two assists, and two steals in 35 minutes.
His scoring gave Philadelphia another major contributor behind Payne and Oubre. Grimes was one of four listed 76ers who scored at least 20 points, demonstrating the breadth of the team’s offensive output.
His two steals also added to Philadelphia’s defensive pressure. When several players contribute to a team’s turnover creation, it becomes more difficult for an opponent to maintain consistent possession and offensive rhythm.
However, points alone do not establish shooting efficiency. The supplied statistics do not include Grimes’s individual field-goal attempts, three-point attempts, or free-throw attempts. Without those numbers, it is not possible to calculate his field-goal percentage or determine exactly how efficiently he produced his 23 points.
VJ Edgecombe: 21 Points and Five Assists
VJ Edgecombe contributed 21 points, five rebounds, five assists, and three steals in 35 minutes.
His statistical line shows a balanced performance. Edgecombe scored efficiently enough in volume to reach 21 points while also contributing as a rebounder, playmaker, and defender.
Five assists indicate that he helped create scoring opportunities beyond his own shots. Three steals were tied for the highest total among Philadelphia’s listed players.
The combination of five assists and three steals is particularly useful when assessing a player’s contribution beyond scoring. Assists measure a portion of offensive creation, while steals record successful defensive takeaways. Both categories help explain how a player can influence possessions without appearing as the final scorer.
The supplied data does not include his shooting splits or individual plus-minus rating. Those measures would be necessary for a more detailed evaluation of his scoring efficiency and on-court point differential.
Dominick Barlow: A Useful Starting Contribution
Dominick Barlow recorded 11 points, six rebounds, and one assist in 34 minutes.
His contribution was less scoring-heavy than those of Philadelphia’s leading players, but his six rebounds helped support the team’s work on the glass.
Barlow was listed as a starter and played the second-highest number of minutes among Philadelphia’s starters, behind Oubre. His 11 points also meant that Philadelphia received double-digit scoring from another member of its starting lineup.
The available numbers support a straightforward assessment: Barlow contributed across scoring and rebounding while playing an extended role. They do not establish his screen-setting effectiveness, defensive matchup assignments, or shooting efficiency.
Trendon Watford: Bench Scoring and Rim Protection
Trendon Watford produced 11 points, four rebounds, two assists, and two blocks in 15 minutes.
His two blocks matched Payne’s team-leading total. Recording two blocks in 15 minutes represents a notable defensive contribution relative to his playing time.
Watford also reached double figures in scoring, giving Philadelphia another productive option outside its starting lineup. His four rebounds and two assists show that his contribution extended beyond points and blocks.
His appearance is a useful reminder that bench value cannot be measured by scoring alone. A reserve can influence a game through defensive plays, rebounding, passing, or efficient use of limited minutes.
The supplied statistics do not include Watford’s individual shooting attempts, so his scoring efficiency cannot be determined from this box score alone.
Other Philadelphia Contributors
Dalen Terry recorded five points, two rebounds, and four assists in 22 minutes. His four assists were the third-highest total among Philadelphia’s listed players, behind Payne and Edgecombe.
Adem Bona finished with four points, three rebounds, one assist, and one steal in 16 minutes. Jabari Walker added two points, two rebounds, and one steal in nine minutes.
Justin Edwards did not score in six minutes but recorded one assist and one steal. A scoreless performance does not automatically mean a player made no contribution, although a small sample of six minutes also limits the conclusions that can be drawn.
Together, these players provided additional rotation minutes and statistical contributions while Philadelphia’s primary scorers carried much of the offensive workload.
Complete Memphis Grizzlies Player Stats
Memphis produced 129 points despite losing the game. Ty Jerome led the team in scoring and assists, while Cedric Coward dominated the individual rebounding totals.
The supplied player statistics show a team with several double-digit scorers, but the Grizzlies could not match Philadelphia’s combination of scoring, defensive takeaways, and ball security.
Memphis Grizzlies Box Score
| Player | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Steals | Blocks |
| Ty Jerome | 25 | 26 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Cedric Coward | 24 | 13 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| GG Jackson | 25 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Rayan Rupert | 22 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Cam Spencer | 24 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Javon Small | 26 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 0 |
| Olivier-Maxence Prosper | 21 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Jaylen Wells | 22 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Taylor Hendricks | 25 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Jahmai Mashack | 27 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Memphis team leaders according to the supplied statistics:
- Points: Ty Jerome, 26
- Rebounds: Cedric Coward, 16
- Assists: Ty Jerome, 8
- Steals: Olivier-Maxence Prosper, 2
- Blocks: Cedric Coward, Olivier-Maxence Prosper, and Taylor Hendricks, 1 each
The supplied starting lineup consisted of Olivier-Maxence Prosper, Taylor Hendricks, Cedric Coward, Jaylen Wells, and Ty Jerome.
GG Jackson, Cam Spencer, Jahmai Mashack, Javon Small, Rayan Rupert, Brandon Clarke, and Walter Clayton Jr. were listed among the bench players. Brandon Clarke and Walter Clayton Jr. were also listed as inactive because of a right calf strain and a right ankle sprain, respectively.
Ty Jerome: Memphis’s Leading Scorer
Ty Jerome finished with 26 points, two rebounds, and eight assists in 25 minutes.
He led Memphis in both scoring and assists, making him the team’s primary statistical contributor in offensive production and playmaking.
His eight assists indicate that Jerome helped generate scoring opportunities for teammates rather than relying exclusively on individual shot creation. His 26 points also placed him just four points below Philadelphia’s leading scorer, Cameron Payne.
Comparing the two players reveals an interesting similarity. Both recorded at least 25 points and eight assists, and both were major offensive contributors. Payne, however, finished with 32 points and 10 assists, giving Philadelphia the stronger individual production in those two categories.
The comparison should not be treated as a complete measure of their performances. Their shooting efficiency, turnovers committed individually, and on-court point differentials are not included in the supplied player lines.
Even so, Jerome’s final numbers demonstrate that Memphis had a productive offensive leader. The loss cannot reasonably be explained by a lack of scoring from its top player alone.
Cedric Coward: 16 Rebounds and a Double-Double
Cedric Coward recorded 13 points, 16 rebounds, three assists, one steal, and one block in 24 minutes.
His 16 rebounds were the highest individual total in the supplied box scores for either team. Coward also reached double digits in both points and rebounds, recording a points-and-rebounds double-double.
The most striking part of his performance is the rebounding total relative to his playing time. Sixteen rebounds in 24 minutes represents approximately 0.67 rebounds per minute. That is a descriptive rate based on his recorded playing time, not a projection of how many rebounds he would necessarily collect in a full game.
Coward’s contribution also illustrates why individual and team rebounding results should be analyzed separately. Memphis collected 44 rebounds overall, four more than Philadelphia. Coward was a major contributor to that total.
However, Memphis’s rebounding advantage did not translate into victory. Rebounds can create additional possessions, particularly when they come on offense, but they cannot guarantee a favorable result if a team also gives away possessions through turnovers.
GG Jackson: A Productive Scoring Option
GG Jackson scored 15 points, collected three rebounds, and recorded two assists in 25 minutes.
His scoring total was the second-highest among Memphis’s listed players, behind Jerome. Jackson helped Memphis maintain multiple scoring threats rather than forcing the offense to depend entirely on its leading scorer.
His 15 points also placed him among the players who made meaningful contributions to the Grizzlies’ 129-point total.
The available statistics do not include his shooting attempts or shooting percentages. It would therefore be premature to describe his performance as especially efficient or inefficient based solely on his points.
Javon Small: Scoring and Playmaking
Javon Small finished with 12 points, five rebounds, seven assists, and one steal in 26 minutes.
His seven assists were second only to Jerome’s eight among Memphis’s listed players. Small therefore provided another substantial source of playmaking.
The combination of 12 points and seven assists suggests that he contributed both as a scorer and as a creator for teammates. His five rebounds also added value outside the traditional scoring and passing categories.
Small’s performance is particularly relevant when examining Memphis’s offensive balance. The team had two players with at least seven assists, but it still committed 20 turnovers overall. Because the supplied data does not identify turnovers by individual player, it would be incorrect to attribute a specific share of those mistakes to Small or Jerome.
Rayan Rupert and Cam Spencer Add Scoring Depth
Rayan Rupert scored 14 points and recorded two rebounds and one steal in 22 minutes. He did not record an assist in the supplied line.
Cam Spencer contributed 12 points, one rebound, and three assists in 24 minutes.
Their combined scoring helped Memphis reach 129 points. Spencer also added playmaking, while Rupert contributed a defensive takeaway.
These performances illustrate the difference between having several capable scorers and controlling the overall game. Memphis had multiple players producing double-digit points, but Philadelphia still created more steals and committed fewer turnovers.
The statistics do not prove that Memphis’s supporting scorers were responsible for the loss. Instead, they show that individual scoring production and team-level possession control were separate parts of the contest.
Olivier-Maxence Prosper and Jaylen Wells
Olivier-Maxence Prosper recorded 11 points, six rebounds, two steals, and one block in 21 minutes.
His six rebounds tied Dominick Barlow for the highest listed rebounding total among the two teams’ players other than Coward and Oubre. Prosper also led Memphis in steals with two.
Jaylen Wells scored 11 points and collected three rebounds in 22 minutes. His supplied line did not include assists, steals, or blocks.
Both players contributed double-digit scoring, helping Memphis spread its offensive production across the lineup.
Taylor Hendricks and Jahmai Mashack
Taylor Hendricks recorded eight points, five rebounds, two assists, and one block in 25 minutes.
Jahmai Mashack contributed seven points, one rebound, and one assist in 27 minutes.
Hendricks provided production across several categories, including rebounding, passing, and rim protection. Mashack played the most minutes among Memphis’s listed players other than Jerome’s team leader status being based on his 25-minute appearance, yet recorded seven points.
Minutes alone do not establish how well a player performed. Role, efficiency, defensive assignments, and the context of each possession also matter. Those details are not available in the supplied box score.
The most defensible conclusion is that Memphis received contributions from its rotation, but the team’s overall turnover total and fourth-quarter scoring decline remained significant factors in the final result.
Team Statistics Comparison: Philadelphia vs. Memphis
The team statistics provide the clearest explanation of how Philadelphia won despite Memphis collecting more rebounds and making more three-pointers.
| Statistical Category | Philadelphia 76ers | Memphis Grizzlies |
| Total Points | 139 | 129 |
| Field Goals Made/Attempted | 45/86 | 48/97 |
| Field-Goal Percentage | 52% | 49% |
| Three-Pointers Made/Attempted | 11/31 | 17/43 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 35% | 40% |
| Free Throws Made/Attempted | 38/46 | 16/21 |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 83% | 76% |
| Total Rebounds | 40 | 44 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 12 | 19 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 28 | 25 |
| Assists | 27 | 26 |
| Turnovers | 10 | 20 |
| Steals | 13 | 5 |
| Blocks | 5 | 3 |
| Personal Fouls | 25 | 31 |
The numbers point to several important differences.
Philadelphia Shot a Higher Percentage From the Field
Philadelphia made 45 of 86 field-goal attempts, while Memphis made 48 of 97.
Although Memphis made three more field goals, Philadelphia attempted 11 fewer shots and recorded the higher field-goal percentage.
Using the supplied makes and attempts, Philadelphia’s field-goal percentage was approximately 52.3%, while Memphis’s was approximately 49.5%.
This distinction matters because made shots must be considered relative to attempts. A team can make more baskets simply because it takes more shots. Percentage-based measures provide additional context about the conversion of those attempts.
Philadelphia’s advantage was not enormous, but it was meaningful in a game decided by 10 points.
Memphis Made More Three-Pointers
Memphis converted 17 of 43 three-point attempts, compared with Philadelphia’s 11 of 31.
The Grizzlies therefore made six more three-pointers. Based on the supplied figures, Memphis scored 51 points from three-point shots, while Philadelphia scored 33.
That created an 18-point advantage for Memphis from beyond the arc.
However, the 76ers won by 10 points. This means Philadelphia outscored Memphis by a combined 28 points across the other scoring sources represented by the final score.
The three-point comparison demonstrates why one shooting category cannot determine a game’s result by itself. Memphis gained a substantial advantage from long range, but Philadelphia made up the difference through its overall scoring profile.
Free Throws Were a Major Difference
Philadelphia attempted 46 free throws and made 38. Memphis attempted 21 and made 16.
The 76ers scored 22 more points at the free-throw line than the Grizzlies.
That advantage was larger than the final 10-point margin. It was one of the most important numerical differences in the game.
Free throws provide scoring opportunities without requiring a field-goal attempt. Their availability often depends on how possessions unfold, including fouls committed during shooting attempts and other qualifying situations.
Philadelphia’s 83% free-throw percentage also exceeded Memphis’s 76%. The 76ers benefited both from attempting substantially more free throws and from converting a larger proportion of them.
The supplied team statistics show that Philadelphia committed 25 personal fouls, compared with Memphis’s 31. However, the foul totals alone do not establish the precise reason for the difference in free-throw attempts. The full play-by-play record would be needed to examine each shooting foul and other free-throw situation.
Turnovers: The Clearest Possession Advantage
Philadelphia committed 10 turnovers, while Memphis committed 20.
That means Memphis recorded twice as many turnovers as Philadelphia.
In a game where both teams scored heavily, this difference is especially important. Every turnover represents a possession that ends without the team getting a normal shot attempt on that possession.
Turnovers can also create transition opportunities for the opposition. Philadelphia recorded 13 steals, compared with Memphis’s five, reinforcing the evidence that the 76ers were more successful at taking the ball away.
However, the statistics do not show how many points Philadelphia scored directly after turnovers. That figure would be required to quantify the exact scoring cost of Memphis’s mistakes.
The broader conclusion remains clear: Philadelphia protected the ball more effectively and recorded substantially more steals.
Memphis Won the Rebounding Battle
Memphis collected 44 total rebounds, while Philadelphia recorded 40.
The Grizzlies also won the offensive rebounding comparison, collecting 19 offensive rebounds against Philadelphia’s 12.
Offensive rebounds can be particularly valuable because they give a team another opportunity to score after a missed shot. Memphis’s seven-rebound advantage on the offensive glass suggests that it created more second-chance opportunities.
Yet Philadelphia still won the game.
This contrast reinforces an important analytical principle: a team can win one statistical category without winning the contest. Rebounding helped Memphis, but it did not offset the combined effects of Philadelphia’s free-throw advantage, stronger field-goal percentage, and lower turnover count.
Assists Showed Relatively Balanced Playmaking
Philadelphia recorded 27 assists, while Memphis recorded 26.
The one-assist difference indicates that the teams produced similar totals in this category.
Assists can provide useful evidence of ball movement and successful passing before made baskets. However, total assists do not fully measure offensive quality. A team can create good shots without receiving an assist on every basket, and an assist total does not show whether those shots were contested or open.
In this matchup, the similar assist totals suggest that neither team had a substantial advantage in recorded assisted baskets. Philadelphia’s larger advantage came from other categories.
Defensive Activity Favored Philadelphia
Philadelphia recorded 13 steals and five blocks. Memphis had five steals and three blocks.
The 76ers therefore finished with eight more steals and two more blocks.
Steals can end an opponent’s possession immediately, while blocks can prevent or alter field-goal attempts. Both categories offer useful insight into defensive activity, although neither fully captures defensive performance.
The supplied numbers suggest that Philadelphia created more defensive disruptions. Combined with the turnover totals, they help explain why the 76ers maintained control of possession-related aspects of the game despite Memphis’s offensive rebounding advantage.
Why the Philadelphia 76ers Won the Game
The most useful way to understand this result is to examine how several statistical advantages worked together. Philadelphia did not win because it dominated every category. Memphis performed better in three-point shooting and rebounding, but the 76ers gained advantages in areas that proved more decisive.
1. Philadelphia Took Better Care of the Ball
The 10-turnover difference stands out as one of the most important statistics.
Philadelphia committed 10 turnovers, while Memphis committed 20. When a team loses possession without completing a normal shot attempt, it reduces its opportunities to score.
Philadelphia also recorded 13 steals. Although steals and turnovers are not identical measures, the combination suggests that the 76ers were more successful at disrupting Memphis’s possessions.
The exact number of points generated from those takeaways is not available in the supplied data. Nevertheless, the possession difference provides a strong explanation for how Philadelphia could win despite making fewer field goals and three-pointers.
2. The Free-Throw Advantage Created a Scoring Cushion
Philadelphia made 38 free throws, compared with Memphis’s 16.
That difference produced 22 additional points from the free-throw line. It was a major part of Philadelphia’s scoring advantage.
The 76ers also made 83% of their free throws, compared with Memphis’s 76%. This meant Philadelphia converted its opportunities at a higher rate.
The result demonstrates why free throws deserve attention in NBA box-score analysis. Three-point shooting often attracts the most attention, but free throws can create an equally important scoring advantage.
3. Philadelphia Finished More Efficiently From the Field
Memphis made 48 field goals, three more than Philadelphia’s 45. However, Memphis needed 97 attempts to reach that total, while Philadelphia used 86.
Philadelphia’s higher field-goal percentage indicates that it converted a larger proportion of its attempts.
The 76ers did not need to make the most baskets or the most three-pointers to win. Their overall shooting percentage and free-throw production helped compensate for Memphis’s advantages in other areas.
4. Philadelphia Produced a Decisive Fourth Quarter
The 41-25 fourth-quarter score was the defining moment of the matchup.
Memphis had outscored Philadelphia in both the second and third quarters. The Grizzlies entered the final period ahead on the cumulative scoreboard, but Philadelphia responded with its highest-scoring quarter.
The available statistics establish the size of the turnaround. They do not identify the exact lineup combinations, individual fourth-quarter scoring totals, or tactical adjustments that caused it.
A play-by-play record would be needed to determine whether the decisive stretch came from transition baskets, free throws, three-pointers, defensive stops, or a combination of those factors.
5. Philadelphia Had Multiple High-Scoring Contributors
Philadelphia had four players with at least 20 points:
- Cameron Payne: 32 points
- Kelly Oubre Jr.: 30 points
- Quentin Grimes: 23 points
- VJ Edgecombe: 21 points
Together, those four players scored 106 points, approximately 76% of Philadelphia’s 139-point total.
Memphis also had a strong group of individual contributors, led by Ty Jerome’s 26 points and supported by several players who reached double figures.
The difference was not simply that Philadelphia had more scorers. Memphis also spread its scoring across multiple players. Instead, Philadelphia’s leading group produced a particularly large share of its final total while the team benefited from better possession control.
Advanced Statistical Insights From the Matchup
Traditional box scores provide the foundation for understanding a basketball game, but a few additional calculations can offer more context.
These calculations use the supplied statistics and should be interpreted as descriptive measures rather than complete player or team evaluations.
Points Per Game Are Not the Same as Scoring Efficiency
Cameron Payne scored 32 points in 30 minutes, while Ty Jerome scored 26 points in 25 minutes.
A simple points-per-minute calculation gives the following results:
| Player | Points | Minutes | Points Per Minute |
| Cameron Payne | 32 | 30 | 1.07 |
| Kelly Oubre Jr. | 30 | 38 | 0.79 |
| Quentin Grimes | 23 | 35 | 0.66 |
| VJ Edgecombe | 21 | 35 | 0.60 |
| Ty Jerome | 26 | 25 | 1.04 |
| GG Jackson | 15 | 25 | 0.60 |
| Cedric Coward | 13 | 24 | 0.54 |
Payne and Jerome produced similar scoring rates per minute, with Payne slightly ahead in this calculation.
However, points per minute does not measure shooting efficiency. It does not account for the number of shots attempted, free throws, turnovers, or the quality of scoring opportunities.
It also should not be used to assume that a player would maintain the same scoring rate over a longer appearance. Fatigue, defensive adjustments, and playing time can change a player’s output.
Estimating True Shooting Percentage
True shooting percentage is a commonly used basketball statistic that estimates scoring efficiency while accounting for field goals, three-pointers, and free throws.
A standard estimate uses this formula:
True Shooting Percentage = Points ÷ [2 × (Field-Goal Attempts + 0.44 × Free-Throw Attempts)] × 100
Using the supplied team totals:
| Team | Points | Field-Goal Attempts | Free-Throw Attempts | Estimated True Shooting Percentage |
| Philadelphia 76ers | 139 | 86 | 46 | 65.1% |
| Memphis Grizzlies | 129 | 97 | 21 | 59.8% |
These are approximate team-level estimates based on the listed totals.
Philadelphia’s estimated true shooting percentage was about 5.3 percentage points higher than Memphis’s. This measure helps explain why Philadelphia scored more points despite attempting fewer field goals.
The estimate is useful for comparing overall scoring efficiency, but it does not measure defense, turnovers, rebounding, or the quality of each shot.
What the Rebound Numbers Reveal
Memphis recorded 44 rebounds, including 19 offensive rebounds. Philadelphia recorded 40 rebounds, including 12 offensive rebounds.
The seven-rebound difference on the offensive glass is meaningful because offensive rebounds can extend possessions.
However, a full rebounding-efficiency analysis would require additional information, including the total number of available rebounds and how many opportunities each team had to collect them.
The available totals are enough to establish that Memphis won the raw rebounding comparison. They are not enough to determine the precise percentage of available rebounds each team secured.
What the Turnover Numbers Reveal
The turnover difference can be expressed in simple terms:
| Measure | Philadelphia | Memphis |
| Turnovers | 10 | 20 |
| Steals Recorded | 13 | 5 |
| Turnovers Per 100 Points Scored | 7.2 | 15.5 |
The final row is a descriptive calculation obtained by dividing each team’s turnovers by its points and multiplying by 100.
Philadelphia committed approximately 7.2 turnovers per 100 points scored, while Memphis committed approximately 15.5.
This measure is not a standard substitute for turnover percentage because it does not account for total possessions. However, it provides another way to compare the teams’ turnover totals relative to their offensive output.
The result reinforces the broader finding: Philadelphia was more careful with possession in a game where both teams scored heavily.
Season Series: Philadelphia’s Second Victory Over Memphis
According to the supplied game record, Philadelphia led the season series 2-0 after the March 11 meeting.
| Meeting | Date | Result |
| First Meeting | December 31, 2025 | Philadelphia 139, Memphis 136, overtime |
| Second Meeting | March 11, 2026 | Philadelphia 139, Memphis 129 |
| Series Result | Two meetings | Philadelphia led 2-0 |
The first meeting required overtime, while the second ended in regulation according to the supplied record.
Both games featured high scoring, with Philadelphia reaching 139 points on each occasion. The results suggest that the 76ers had the better outcome in both listed meetings.
However, two games are not enough to establish that one team would necessarily win a future matchup. Player availability, lineups, shooting performance, and game conditions can change significantly between meetings.
The supplied record also lists Philadelphia at 35-30 overall and Memphis at 23-41 overall at the time of the game. These records provide context for the matchup, but they should not be interpreted as a complete explanation of the result.
How to Read NBA Player Statistics Correctly
A useful box-score analysis goes beyond identifying the highest scorer. The following principles help readers understand individual performances and team results more accurately.
Start With the Final Score and Quarter Totals
The final score establishes the result, while quarter totals reveal when the game changed.
In this matchup, the fourth-quarter difference immediately stands out. Philadelphia scored 16 more points than Memphis in the final period after trailing through the first three quarters.
Compare Shooting Percentages With Attempts
Made shots alone can be misleading.
Memphis made more field goals and three-pointers, but Philadelphia recorded the higher overall field-goal percentage. Comparing makes, attempts, and percentages gives a more complete picture of scoring efficiency.
Separate Individual Production From Team Results
Cameron Payne and Ty Jerome both recorded strong scoring and playmaking numbers. Yet only Payne’s team won.
Likewise, Cedric Coward collected 16 rebounds, but Memphis lost the overall game.
These examples demonstrate why individual statistics should be evaluated within the context of team performance.
Check Turnovers and Free Throws
Turnovers and free throws can have a major effect on the final score.
Philadelphia’s 10 turnovers compared with Memphis’s 20 represented a substantial difference in ball security. Its 38 made free throws compared with Memphis’s 16 also produced a major scoring advantage.
Ignoring these categories would leave an incomplete explanation of the result.
Recognize the Limits of the Box Score
The supplied figures support several conclusions, but they do not answer every question.
For example, they do not establish:
- Each player’s individual shooting efficiency.
- Which lineups performed best.
- How many points each team scored after turnovers.
- Which player scored the most points in the fourth quarter.
- Each player’s plus-minus rating.
- The precise tactical adjustments made by either coaching staff.
Those questions require additional statistical records or play-by-play information. A trustworthy analysis should distinguish between what the available numbers demonstrate and what remains unknown.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the 76ers vs. Memphis Grizzlies game on March 11, 2026?
The Philadelphia 76ers defeated the Memphis Grizzlies 139-129 on March 11, 2026, according to the supplied game record. Philadelphia won the fourth quarter 41-25 to secure the 10-point victory.
2. Who scored the most points in the game?
Cameron Payne led all listed players with 32 points for Philadelphia. Kelly Oubre Jr. scored 30 points, while Memphis’s leading scorer, Ty Jerome, finished with 26 points.
3. Which player recorded the most rebounds?
Cedric Coward of Memphis recorded the highest individual rebound total, with 16 rebounds in 24 minutes. Kelly Oubre Jr. led Philadelphia with 12 rebounds.
4. How many assists did Cameron Payne record?
Cameron Payne recorded 10 assists alongside 32 points, three rebounds, three steals, and two blocks in 30 minutes. His 32 points and 10 assists gave him a points-and-assists double-double.
5. Why did Philadelphia beat Memphis despite making fewer three-pointers?
Philadelphia made 11 three-pointers compared with Memphis’s 17, but the 76ers had several other advantages. They shot a higher percentage from the field, made 22 more free throws, committed 10 fewer turnovers, and recorded eight more steals. Philadelphia also outscored Memphis 41-25 in the fourth quarter.
6. What were the teams’ total rebounds and turnovers?
Memphis recorded 44 rebounds and 20 turnovers. Philadelphia collected 40 rebounds and committed 10 turnovers. Memphis won the rebounding comparison, while Philadelphia had the clear advantage in ball security.
Conclusion
The March 11, 2026, matchup between the Philadelphia 76ers and Memphis Grizzlies produced a 139-129 victory for Philadelphia. The 76ers vs memphis grizzlies match player stats show that Cameron Payne led the winning team with 32 points and 10 assists, Kelly Oubre Jr. added 30 points and 12 rebounds, and Quentin Grimes and VJ Edgecombe contributed 23 and 21 points, respectively.
Memphis also had several strong individual performances. Ty Jerome scored 26 points and recorded eight assists, while Cedric Coward collected 16 rebounds. The Grizzlies made more field goals and three-pointers and won the overall rebounding battle, but those advantages were not enough to secure the victory.
The most decisive differences were Philadelphia’s 38 made free throws, its 10 turnovers compared with Memphis’s 20, and its 41-point fourth quarter. The 76ers also recorded a higher field-goal percentage and more steals.
Ultimately, this game demonstrates why basketball statistics must be evaluated together rather than in isolation. Individual scoring, rebounding, shooting efficiency, ball security, and late-game performance all help explain the final result. Philadelphia’s balanced production and stronger finish made the difference in a contest where both teams showed substantial offensive ability.
